Download our free Employee Benefits compensation comparison today!

From cost visibility and incentive alignment to conflict of interest risk and service flexibility, this side-by-side comparison chart outlines the pros and cons of fee-based vs. commission-based broker compensation.

Download the side-by-side comparison chart today!

Employee Benefits Broker Compensation: A Side-by-Side Comparison

For businesses seeking clarity and control over their employee benefits budget, understanding the difference between fee-based and commission-based broker compensation is essential. A fee-based model offers full transparency, ensuring you know exactly what you’re paying for. This approach allows for objective advice that is aligned with your company’s specific goals, free from the potential bias of commission incentives. You can also scope fees to specific projects, such as RFPs or audits, which ensures clear deliverables and pricing for special projects. This model is particularly well-suited for complex benefit programs that require customized consulting and flexible fee structures for strategic work.

In contrast, the main benefit of a commission-based broker is that the cost is baked into carrier premiums, so there is no separate bill to manage. However, this model can make it harder to see the actual compensation and may lead to a focus on higher-commission plans that might not be the best value for your company. The attached comparison chart provides a side-by-side look at these two models across key areas like cost visibility, incentive alignment, and service flexibility. By downloading this chart, you can gain a deeper understanding of which compensation structure is best for your unique business needs, whether you prioritize budget transparency and customized service or a more traditional, all-in-one approach

Download your free copy now to learn more!